Skip to main content
Sod DeliverySod PrepSod Installation

What Your Soil Test Means for New Sod: Reading a UConn, UMass, Rutgers, or Cornell Report Before You Fertilize

By the CT Sod crew·30 years of sod industry experience·14 min read
Jump to:
Under Sod™ granular fertilizer raked into prepared topsoil before new sod is laid — mixed into the soil, not spread on top.

Every fertilizer question about new sod in the Northeast comes back to one line on one piece of paper: the phosphorus line of a soil test. It decides whether the bag under the sod should carry phosphate or not, it decides what is legal to put down in Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, and New Jersey, and it decides whether UNDER SOD™ is the right first bag or the wrong one. This post is about that piece of paper: how to get it from the four Northeast university labs, why their numbers do not match each other, and what each result means for a sod install.

Quick answer

Quick answer, as of September 2026. Test the soil the sod will root in, before the sod is ordered, at one of the four Northeast land-grant labs: UConn, UMass, Rutgers, or Cornell through Agro-One. Read the phosphorus line first. If the report says phosphorus is below optimum, put a high-phosphorus starter into the soil at installation at the report's rate; that is legal in every Northeast state under the new-lawn exception. If it says optimum or above, which is what most established Northeast lawns return, skip the high-phosphorus starter and use UNDER SOD™, one bag per pallet mixed into the top 4 to 6 inches. Follow the report's lime line at the same time. Thirty days later the feeding is phosphorus-free on either path. The four labs use two different extractants and three different units, so a number from one report cannot be read on another lab's scale; use the category the lab prints, not the number.

Why the test decides the bag

A soil test decides the fertilizer under new sod because phosphorus does not move in soil and cannot be measured by looking at the lawn. Nitrogen changes week to week and is applied by the calendar; phosphorus and potassium sit where they are, sometimes for decades, and Cornell's turf program puts it plainly: soil testing measures the availability of phosphorus and potassium, not nitrogen, and only if phosphorus is low should a fertilizer with phosphorus be used. Decades of lawn fertilizer have pushed most established Northeast lawns to medium or high phosphorus, while fill and scraped subsoil on new construction often test low. Those two soils need opposite bags under the sod, and the test is the only way to tell them apart.

The law follows the same line. Connecticut allows phosphorus on an established lawn only when a soil test from the last two years calls for it, and allows it when seeding or sodding a new lawn; UConn's soil lab explains the rule. New York allows phosphorus on established turf only when a soil test shows a deficiency or when a new lawn is being established, and the state's own FAQ notes Cornell research found no turf benefit above 4 ppm of Morgan-extractable phosphorus. Massachusetts and New Jersey require a soil test within three years to put phosphorus on an established lawn; the details are on the Massachusetts and New Jersey rules pages. The new-lawn exception is what makes a starter legal under sod on a low test. It does not make it useful on a high one.

How to take the sample for a sod job

Sample the soil the sod will actually root in. If the job is bringing in 4 to 6 inches of screened topsoil over the old grade, test that topsoil, not the lawn it is replacing; the roots will spend their first season in the imported layer. If the sod is going on the existing grade after tilling, sample the existing soil. On new construction, sample after the rough grade is set, because the top of a scraped lot is often subsoil that tests nothing like the topsoil that was hauled away.

Cornell's method is the one every lab accepts: use a soil corer or a trowel to gather 10 to 20 subsamples at a consistent depth from a uniform area, mix them in a clean bucket, air-dry the mix, and send the amount the lab's form asks for (UMass wants one cup, Rutgers two). Sample to the depth the lab's instructions give (Rutgers says 6 to 7 inches for a home lawn) and keep every core the same depth; for a sod job that is also close to the depth the fertilizer will be mixed into. Keep separate samples for areas that are obviously different, a sunny front and a shaded back, or the old lawn and a new fill pad. Allow at least two weeks, longer in spring. UConn's standard test is $18, and the other three labs are in the same range.

The recommendation on the report depends on what you tell the lab you are growing, and a new lawn is not the same crop code as an established one. UMass will not print lime or nutrient recommendations without a crop code; use the home-lawn code so the numbers come back per 1,000 square feet, and follow its sampling instructions (one cup, air-dried, $20). Rutgers takes a kit from a county extension office or a mailed sample with its home and landscape questionnaire, which asks what you are planting so the recommendation fits a new lawn; its sampling instructions call for 10 to 15 cores 6 to 7 inches deep. In New York, Cornell Cooperative Extension sends samples to Agro-One on the Home Garden and Lawn form with the standard package. UConn sells prepaid kits through extension centers and takes mailed samples; ask for the lawn recommendation. On every form, name the sample so you can match it to the area, and write the square footage.

The four labs, side by side

The four Northeast land-grant labs do not report on the same scale. UConn, UMass, and Cornell use the Morgan or modified Morgan extractant, developed at UConn in the 1930s for New England soils; Rutgers uses Mehlich-3, a stronger extractant that pulls more phosphorus out of the same soil. Units differ too: UConn and Cornell report pounds per acre, UMass reports parts per million, and Rutgers reports pounds per acre (its ppm figure times two). Cornell's Nutrient Management Spear Program says outright that results from one method cannot be read against another method's calibration, and the conversion tool it offers for Mehlich-3 to Morgan equivalents needs the soil's pH, calcium, and aluminum, not just the phosphorus number. So the table below carries the categories each lab prints, and the number ranges only where the lab publishes them. When you use the reader further down, enter the category from your report.

LabWho uses itExtractant and unitsWhat the report printsPublished phosphorus and potassium ranges
UConn Soil Nutrient Analysis Laboratory (Storrs)ConnecticutModified Morgan; pounds per acreBelow Optimum, Optimum, Above Optimum for P, K, Ca, Mg; a lime rate in pounds per 1,000 sq ft; a nitrogen-only recommendation when P and K are at or above optimumLab's published table: phosphorus below optimum 0 to 13, optimum 14 to 20, above optimum 21 and up; potassium below optimum 0 to 249, optimum 250 to 349, above optimum 350 and up (lb/acre)
UMass Soil and Plant Nutrient Testing Laboratory (Amherst)Massachusetts; the test the state law names for established lawnsModified Morgan; parts per millionYour value next to an optimum range for each nutrient; a lime recommendation from buffer pHLawn reports show an optimum range of 4 to 14 ppm phosphorus and 100 to 160 ppm potassium; UMass turf guidance treats above 10 ppm P and above 100 ppm K as adequate
Rutgers Soil Testing Laboratory (New Brunswick)New JerseyMehlich-3; pounds per acre (ppm × 2)A bar for each nutrient marked Below Optimum (very low, low, medium), Optimum (high), or Above Optimum (very high), per fact sheet FS719Category-based; the lab publishes crop-specific cutoffs (for example, above 50 lb P/acre is adequate for a tree crop) rather than one lawn number
Cornell guidelines through Agro-One (Dairy One, Ithaca)New YorkMorgan; pounds per acreA bar from Very Low to Very High with Cornell's recommendation lines; order the standard package on the Home Garden and Lawn formCategory-based; Cornell research cited by NY DEC found no turf benefit above 4 ppm Morgan phosphorus

Two things follow from that table. First, the same lawn can read 12 at UConn and 40 at Rutgers and be the same soil; do not compare numbers across labs. Second, the category is what the lab's fertilizer recommendation is built on, and the category is what the state law reads. Everything below is keyed to the category.

Reading the phosphorus line

The phosphorus category on a Northeast soil test decides which bag goes under the sod: below optimum means a high-phosphorus starter at the report's rate, optimum or above means a low-phosphorus rooting bag. Three outcomes.

Below optimum (Very Low, Low, or Medium on a Rutgers or Cornell bar)

Phosphorus is genuinely short, which is common on stripped subsoil, new-construction fill, sand, and old farm fields that were never limed. The report prints a phosphate number in pounds of P2O5 per 1,000 square feet (or per acre; divide by 43.56). Put that phosphate into the soil at installation, mixed 4 to 6 inches deep with the lime, using a legal high-phosphorus starter such as an 18-24-12 or a 12-18-8 at the rate that delivers the report's number; every Northeast state allows it when establishing a new lawn. UNDER SOD™'s pound of phosphate per 1,000 is not built for a deficient site, and the honest answer on this test is the starter first, at the report's rate. Once the sod is rooted, the surface feeding at 30 days is still phosphorus-free; the phosphate you put in the soil is where the roots are.

Optimum (High on a Rutgers or Cornell bar)

This is the test most established Northeast lawns return, and it is the soil UNDER SOD™ was built for. The lab's own recommendation on this result is nitrogen, with little or no phosphate, because more phosphorus does not improve turf and, on an established lawn, is not legal without the test. Under sod, the establishment exception allows a light dose at the root, which is what UNDER SOD™'s 4-2-5 carries: one bag per pallet mixed into the top 4 to 6 inches puts 1 pound of phosphate per 1,000 square feet where the severed roots land, with the potassium and the biology in the same layer. The under-sod comparison is the full case for that bag against the alternatives.

Above optimum (Very High)

Phosphorus does nothing for the sod on this soil, and it can suppress the mycorrhizal colonization a rooting bag is trying to establish. The law still allows phosphate at installation, but the lab is telling you not to add any. UNDER SOD™ remains a reasonable rooting bag here because its phosphate is small and sits inside the establishment window, but if the report flags phosphorus as excessive, the cleaner choice is a phosphorus-free slow-release bag mixed to the same 4-to-6-inch depth, with lime and potassium per the report. Either way, nothing with a middle number goes on top of this lawn again without a new test.

Reading the potassium line

Potassium is the second line, and it changes the rate, not the bag. A below-optimum potassium test is common on sandy shoreline soils, because potassium leaches from low-CEC sand (UMass's interpretation guide says as much), and the report prints a potash number to build the level back. UNDER SOD™ delivers 2.5 pounds of K2O per 1,000 square feet at installation and OVER SOD™ another 0.75 at 30 days, which covers a typical build recommendation for a lawn; if the report asks for more than that, make up the difference with sulfate of potash (0-0-50) mixed in at installation. On an optimum test, the two bags maintain it. On an above-optimum test, no extra potash, and the two bags' potassium is still within a normal season's application.

pH and lime: the line people skip

New England soils run naturally acidic, 4.5 to 5.5 by UMass's account, and cool-season turf wants 6.0 to 7.0. Below about 6.0 phosphorus locks up, aluminum comes into solution, and the bacteria in the soil slow down, which is a bad combination for a bag that relies on biology. The report gives a lime rate from the buffer pH; that rate is the one to use, not a rule of thumb. At installation, lime goes in with the fertilizer: Michigan State's sod guide has incorporated lime and fertilizer into the top 4 inches as the final grade is prepared since 2004, and Rutgers puts lime 4 to 6 inches deep before seeding or sodding (FS584). If lime is applied to the surface later instead, UConn caps a single surface application at 50 to 75 pounds per 1,000 square feet and repeats at intervals; a big correction takes a season either way. Sulfur lowers pH when a soil tests above 7.0; UMass gives 5 to 10 pounds per 1,000 for about half a unit, never more than 15 in one application.

Soil test reader for new sod

Enter the lab that ran your test and the categories it printed. The reader turns them into the install bag, the potassium and lime notes, the 30-day feeding, and the legal note for your state. It reads the category on your report; it does not convert numbers between labs.

Soil test reader for new sod

Enter what the report prints. Numbers are read only for UConn (lb/acre) and UMass (ppm); every other lab uses the category.

Reports in pounds per acre (modified Morgan).
Bringing in topsoil for this job?

Phosphorus: Optimum. This is the soil UNDER SOD™ was built for. Under the sod: UNDER SOD™, one 25 lb bag per pallet, mixed into the top 4 to 6 inches before the finish grade: 4 bags of 25 lb for 2,000 sq ft. No high-phosphorus starter; the lab's own recommendation on this result is nitrogen with little or no phosphate.

Potassium: Optimum. The two bags maintain it: 2.5 lb of K2O per 1,000 sq ft at installation and 0.75 lb at 30 days. No extra potash.

pH 5.6: below the 6.0 to 7.0 range for cool-season turf. Apply lime at the rate the report prints (it is set from the buffer pH, not from the pH alone) and mix it into the top 4 to 6 inches with the fertilizer before the finish grade. If lime has to go on after the sod is down, keep a single surface application to 50 to 75 lb per 1,000 sq ft and repeat at intervals.

At 30 days, after the tug test: a phosphorus-free feeding at 0.75 to 1.0 lb of nitrogen per 1,000 sq ft on every path (OVER SOD™ one bag per four pallets when it ships; LESCO 24-0-11 at 4.2 lb per 1,000 until then). The 30-day feeding scorecard compares the bags.

Connecticut: phosphorus may go on an established lawn only when a soil test from the last two years recommends it; seeding or sodding a new lawn is exempt, so a starter is legal under sod on a low test. Keep this report; it is your legal basis for two years.

Rules: Connecticut lawn rules page. Bags at 30 days: the 30-day feeding scorecard.

If you would rather have a person read it: send a photo of the report through the contact page with the town and the square footage, or call (203) 806-4086 with it in front of you, and we will tell you which bag goes under the sod and what the report's lime line means for the install.

Four soils, four reports

The 30-year lawn being replaced

Optimum or above-optimum phosphorus, optimum potassium, pH in the mid 5s. This is the typical Fairfield County or Westchester result. Lime per the report, UNDER SOD™ one bag per pallet, phosphorus-free at 30 days. No starter.

The new-construction pad

Below-optimum phosphorus and potassium, low organic matter, pH anywhere. This is subsoil. Bring in topsoil if the budget allows and test the topsoil; if the sod is going on the pad, put the report's phosphate and potash in with a starter and lime, 4 to 6 inches deep, and treat UNDER SOD™'s pound as a supplement, not the plan. The biology matters most on this soil, which is the one honest argument for adding UNDER SOD™ on top of a starter here: the mycorrhizae have nothing to work with in fill until something inoculates it.

The shoreline sand

Phosphorus optimum, potassium below optimum, pH often above 6 near salt water. Potassium is the story: the report's potash number, sulfate of potash at install if UNDER SOD™'s 2.5 pounds does not reach it, and a slow-release share of at least 60 percent on every nitrogen feeding, which is Cornell's rule for sand and the reason the 30-day feeding scorecard scores that column.

The lot next to the pond

Any phosphorus result, but a 20-foot buffer in Connecticut and New York and a blackout calendar. The test still decides the bag; the state pages decide where and when it can go down.

What we do not claim

  • The ranges in the table are the labs' published categories; the labs revise them, and the report in your hand governs. We do not convert numbers between extractants and neither should a calculator.
  • A soil test does not measure nitrogen usefully in a humid climate; nitrogen is set by the calendar and the grass, not the report.
  • UNDER SOD™'s phosphate is 1 pound per 1,000 square feet at installation, on a planned label. That is a low-test supplement, not a low-test fix; on a below-optimum report, follow the report.
  • No independent trial has compared rooting bags across soil-test categories on new sod. The advice above is the labs' guidance applied to the two-step sequence, not a trial of this product.

The procedure, in one place

  1. Sample the soil the sod will root in: 10 to 20 cores, 4 inches deep, mixed; the imported topsoil if you are bringing some in.
  2. Send it to your state's land-grant lab (UConn, UMass, Rutgers, or Cornell through Agro-One) two to three weeks before the sod is ordered.
  3. Read phosphorus first. Below optimum: a high-phosphorus starter at the report's rate, mixed 4 to 6 inches deep. Optimum or above: UNDER SOD™, one bag per pallet, same depth.
  4. Read potassium. Make up any shortfall with sulfate of potash at installation.
  5. Lime at the report's rate, mixed in with the fertilizer, before the finish grade.
  6. Lay the sod the same day the soil is finished, roll, water.
  7. At 30 days, after the tug test, a phosphorus-free feeding on every path; the bags are compared in the 30-day feeding scorecard.
  8. Keep the report. In Connecticut it is your legal basis for two years, in Massachusetts and New Jersey for three.

Why the first bag goes under the sod and the second stays phosphorus-free is in Why New Sod Is Fed in Two Steps and Why OVER SOD™ Exists. The sod-prep sequence the test fits into is the sod installation guide.

Sources

Ready To Order?

Fresh-Cut Sod Delivered

CT Sod delivers Kentucky Bluegrass, Tall Fescue & RTF sod across CT, MA, NY, NJ, RI, NH, VT & ME.

From The Field

Our Recent Sod Installation Work

Final aerial descent over the completed Central Middle School entrance sod in Greenwich.
Watch on its own page →
Straight down over the finished lawn — tight checkerboard seams running from the gazebo to the privacy hedges.
Watch on its own page →
Drone overview of the finished backyard once the fresh sod was down — New Canaan, CT, June 16, 2026.
Watch on its own page →

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I need a soil test before laying sod?+
Yes, if you want to know whether the fertilizer under the sod should carry phosphorus. Most established Northeast lawns test optimum or above, which means no high-phosphorus starter; fill and scraped subsoil often test low, which means a starter at the report's rate. The test is also the legal basis for phosphorus on an established lawn in Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, and New Jersey.
Which lab should I use for a sod soil test?+
Your state's land-grant lab: UConn in Connecticut, UMass in Massachusetts (the law names its method), Rutgers in New Jersey, and Cornell's guidelines through Agro-One in New York. Each prints a category for phosphorus and potassium and a lime rate.
Can I compare a UConn number to a Rutgers number?+
No. UConn, UMass, and Cornell use the Morgan extractant; Rutgers uses Mehlich-3, which pulls more phosphorus from the same soil, and the units differ. Use the category the lab prints (below optimum, optimum, above optimum), not the number.
My test says phosphorus is optimum. Do I still use a starter fertilizer under sod?+
No. On an optimum test the lab recommends nitrogen with little or no phosphate. Under sod, use a low-phosphorus rooting bag such as UNDER SOD™, one bag per pallet mixed into the top 4 to 6 inches, with lime per the report.
My test says phosphorus is low. Is UNDER SOD™ enough?+
No. UNDER SOD™ carries 1 pound of phosphate per 1,000 square feet, which is a supplement, not a correction. On a below-optimum test, mix a legal high-phosphorus starter into the soil at the report's rate at installation. UNDER SOD™ can go in with it for the biology, especially on fill.
How deep do I sample for a sod job?+
About 4 inches, 10 to 20 cores mixed together, from the soil the sod will root in. If you are bringing in topsoil, sample the topsoil, not the old lawn.
Does the soil test tell me how much nitrogen to use?+
Not usefully. Nitrogen changes week to week and the labs set it by the crop, not the sample. For new sod it is about 1 pound per 1,000 square feet at 30 days, phosphorus-free, then the seasonal schedule.
How long is a soil test good for under the phosphorus laws?+
Two years in Connecticut; three years in Massachusetts and New Jersey; New York requires a test showing a deficiency. New-lawn establishment is exempt in all four states, which is why a starter is legal under sod on a low test.
Should lime go in before or after the sod?+
Before, mixed into the top 4 to 6 inches with the fertilizer at the report's rate. Surface lime after the sod is down works slowly and is limited to about 50 to 75 pounds per 1,000 square feet per application.

What Customers Say

Rated By Real Homeowners

4.6 out of 565 Google reviews

K
Kurt Kuchenbrod
Google Review

If you are looking for sod in the New England area this is the place to go. My son and his family recently moved to Claremont NH and needed sod. Due to his busy schedule and being new to the area and not being able to find a local installer I planned a trip from NC to install it for him. The ordering process was easy and I believe Kayla was helpful on the phone explaining different grass options and what would work best for the area. She scheduled the sod delivery about a month out for me which allowed me to time plan my short weekend trip. On delivery day things did not go as planned due to situations beyond CT Sod’s control. I was updated by Sean throughout the day regarding the issues and his plans to make it happen. Unfortunately it did not. Sean promised to make it right and realized I had a made a special trip up for the install. I did not get to install sod that weekend but Sean and CT Sod went above and beyond to make the issue right. Sod was delivered and installed a few days after I arrived home and the quality and customer service was above and beyond. The sod looked so good people who were driving by have been inquiring to my son about where it was from and commenting how great it looks. Shout out to CT Sod for making a bad situation into a great one. As a general contractor in NC I wish we had vendors like these folks who do the right thing without being asked!!!

S
Stephen Minar
Google Review

We had a great experience with CT Sod. After our pool installation, our yard needed significant cleanup and restoration. Their team did an excellent job prepping the area with quality topsoil and installing the new sod. They were professional, friendly, and especially careful working around our brand-new pool and patio. Communication was easy throughout the process via text, and they took the time to recommend the right type of sod specifically for the conditions in our yard. The finished lawn exceeded our expectations and looks fantastic. They also provided great value—we were able to use the extra topsoil and sod to improve other areas of our property. Overall, very happy with the quality of the work and the entire experience with CT Sod.

S
Steve Vitko
Google Review

I recently dealt with Sean and Kayla to set up a sod installation around a new pool - couldn’t be happier with the process, price, and results. Highly recommend CT Sod - you won’t be disappointed with this company. I snapped this while the guys were working. In 4 hours they almost had the whole 5,000 square feet of fresh Kentucky Bluegrass installed. Results speak for themselves.

B
Brayden Mccourt
Google Review

CT Sod does all of our sod work, and they always do an awesome job. They're easy to work with, show up when they say they will, and everything always comes out looking great. We've used them on multiple jobs and have never been disappointed. Definitely recommend them if you need sod done right!

R
Ruben Ramos Jr.
Google Review

I recently had my lawn done by CT SOD, and I couldn't be more impressed with the entire experience. From the initial prep work to the final installation, everything was completed in just one day, and the results exceeded my expectations. The lawn looks absolutely beautiful, and it's clear the team takes pride in the quality of their work. They were professional, efficient, and left everything clean when they finished. If you're looking for a company that delivers excellent results and great service, I highly recommend CT SOD. Thank you for an outstanding job!

N
NM
Google Review

We had a great experience with this sod company. They were professional, reliable, and did an excellent job from start to finish. Sean was very easy to work with! The lawn has rooted well and looks healthy and beautiful. We're very happy with the quality of their work and would definitely recommend them to anyone looking for new sod installation. Thank you for a job well done!

M
Maju Carvalho
Google Review

I had an excellent experience with CT SO company from start to finish. They prepared the ground and installed new sod with great care and professionalism. The crew was punctual, hardworking, and paid attention to every detail. What impressed me the most was how comfortable they made me feel throughout the entire process. They took the time to explain each step, answered all of my questions, and made sure I knew what to expect. Their communication was outstanding, and I always felt confident that my yard was in good hands. The finished lawn looks beautiful, and the quality of their work exceeded my expectations. I highly recommend this company to anyone looking for reliable, honest, and skilled lawn professionals. I'm very happy!!! Thank you for transforming my yard!

J
Jon Gyscek
Google Review

Best sod company around. We've used them on about 5 of our Hamptons properties and I wouldn't recommend anyone else. Sean and his employees are thorough, neat, and stick to their schedule. Top quality. High recommend.